Search
 
Home| Contact Us| Join Our Mailing List| New Journals| Browse Journals| Journal Prices| For Authors| Advanced Search
Bookmark and Share
HOME > JOURNALS BY SUBJECT > COMPUTER SCIENCE > PPL
Parallel Processing Letters (PPL)
Current Issue | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | All Volumes (1991-2011)

Volume: 13, Issue: 4(2003) pp. 615-627     DOI: 10.1142/S0129626403001550
Abstract | Full Text (PDF, 689KB) | References
Title: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PROTOCOLS FOR EFFICIENT DATA PROPAGATION IN SMART DUST NETWORKS
This work has been partially supported by the IST Programme of the European Union under contract numbers IST-1999-14186 and IST-2001-33116 .
Author(s):
IOANNIS CHATZIGIANNAKIS
Computer Technology Institute, P. O. Box 1122, 26110 Patras, Greece

Dept. of Computer Engineering and Informatics, University of Patras, 26500 Patras, Greece

TASSOS DIMITRIOU
Athens Information Technology, P. O. Box 68, 19002 Peania, Athens, Greece

MARIOS MAVRONICOLAS
Dept. of Computer Science, University of Cyprus, CY-1678 Nicosia, Greece

SOTIRIS NIKOLETSEAS
Computer Technology Institute, P. O. Box 1122, 26110 Patras, Greece

Dept. of Computer Engineering and Informatics, University of Patras, 26500 Patras, Greece

PAUL SPIRAKIS
Computer Technology Institute, P. O. Box 1122, 26110 Patras, Greece

Dept. of Computer Engineering and Informatics, University of Patras, 26500 Patras, Greece
History:
Received 16 February 2003
Revised 26 September 2003
Abstract:
Smart Dust is comprised of a vast number of ultra-small fully autonomous computing and communication devices, with very restricted energy and computing capabilities, that co-operate to accomplish a large sensing task. Smart Dust can be very useful in practice i.e. in the local detection of a remote crucial event and the propagation of data reporting its realization to a control center. In this work, we have implemented and experimentally evaluated four protocols ( , and two variations of which we here introduce ) for local detection and propagation in smart dust networks, under new, more general and realistic modelling assumptions. We comparatively study, by using extensive experiments, their behavior highlighting their relative advantages and disadvantages. All protocols are very successful. In the setting we considered here, seems to be faster while the based protocols are more energy efficient.
Keywords:
Wireless sensor networks; self-organizing network; propagation protocols

Imperial College Press  |  Global Publishing  |  Asia-Pacific Biotech News  |  Innovation Magazine  |  Asia Pacific Mathematics Newsletter
Labcreations Co  |  Meeting Matters  |  National Academies Press

World Scientific is a Member of CrossRef

Copyright © 2012 World Scientific Publishing Co. All rights reserved.